Skip to content
☕ Buy me a coffee → Any donations go towards API costs and time spent on the website. Thank you!
Technology & Innovation · 15 min read

Can an Electric Car Catch a Criminal? The Physics, the Payload and the Pursuit

British policing has promised to electrify a fleet that is four-fifths diesel — but the pursuit, the armed response car and the 3am rural shift are governed by physics a procurement target cannot waive. A guide for the people signing the forms, with two interactive tools: match the car to the role, fund the charging first, and do not let a demonstration write fleet policy.

N

Nathan Tracey

Illustration for “Can an Electric Car Catch a Criminal? The Physics, the Payload and the Pursuit”

In September 2019 an officer in Fremont, California, radioed something no pursuit commander had heard before: his patrol car — a Tesla the city had converted as an experiment — was low on charge, and he would “have to find a way to get it to the Supercharger.” The suspect got away, for unrelated reasons, and nobody was hurt. But the call named the question now sitting on every police fleet manager’s desk: when the fleet goes electric, what happens on the day the job does not fit the battery?

This is written for the people who answer that with a signature — the procurement leads and policy makers deciding what the next generation of police cars will be. The useful brief is neither the salesroom’s (it out-accelerates anything a criminal drives) nor the sceptic’s (they run out mid-shift). It is duller, and it holds: match the powertrain to the role, fund the charging before you buy the cars, and never let a manufacturer’s demonstration — or a tabloid anecdote — write fleet policy.

The commitment: 32,000 vehicles, 80% diesel, fewer than 1,000 chargers

UK forces run just under 32,000 vehicles. When the National Police Chiefs’ Council, the Association of Police and Crime Commissioners and BlueLight Commercial launched their joint decarbonisation programme in November 2021, about 80% were diesel, police estates held fewer than 1,000 charge points, and the programme’s own analysis put the number a fully electric fleet would need above 8,000. From 2030 no new petrol or diesel car can be sold in the UK; plug-in hybrids get until 2035. Nothing carves out a police car. The direction is fixed; the argument is the route.

Some forces moved early. Gloucestershire bought 75 Nissan EVs in February 2020 — then the largest electric share of any UK fleet — Police Scotland ordered 180 Hyundai Konas, seven forces trialled a converted Ford Mustang Mach-E, and the Met has run hydrogen Toyota Mirais since 2018. This is a live experiment with years of results in, and they are more interesting than either slogan.

A Metropolitan Police BMW i3 electric car in Battenberg livery, marked Low Emissions Vehicle, parked on King Charles Street in Westminster
The experiment is already on the street: a Met BMW i3 in Westminster. The question is no longer whether electric cars can do police work — it is which police work, and what fills the gap for the rest. Photo: Hullian OneEleven, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

What a police car does all day (and why most of it suits a battery)

The image behind the sceptic’s case is a car at 140 mph. The reality of response work is short hard bursts, a lot of low-speed patrol, and hours parked with the lights on.

The best public numbers come from a trial Tesla ran with UK emergency services in 2021. Read them with the scepticism any manufacturer’s demonstration earns — but read them: a converted Model 3 managed over 200 miles of blue-light driving on a charge, three hours of ANPR cost “less than a few miles”, and — the figure that matters most — the average UK blue-light run lasts 7 to 15 minutes. The shape holds beyond the sales deck: Škoda’s police Enyaq claims over 300 miles, and East Midlands Ambulance Service’s electric cars average about 40 miles a day.

The static half of the shift is where the EV simply wins. A patrol car spends around half its time idling, and an idling diesel burns roughly two litres an hour to run a few hundred watts of lights and radios; an EV holds the same cordon at about 0.2 kWh an hour — a 75 kWh pack could light a scene guard for most of a week. Add the instant torque that wins the 0–30 sprint deciding whether a failed-to-stop even becomes a pursuit, and the verdict on the ordinary day is plain: for beat, neighbourhood, most response and all static work, the electric car is the better tool, not a compromise.

Then there is the other 2% of the job.

The pursuit problem: the cube law does not negotiate

Pin this above the procurement desk: the power to push a car through the air rises with the cube of its speed. Double the speed, eight times the drag power. At 30 mph aerodynamics barely register; at 130 they are the whole bill. That is why lab range collapses at speed. Independent testing of a BMW i4 M50 — the closest thing to an electric traffic car — measured 155 Wh/km at 90 km/h and 217 at 120. Push to real pursuit speed and it stops being subtle: a Porsche Taycan held at a sustained 160 mph emptied its 93 kWh pack in about 80 miles. Winter takes another bite — 78% range retention at freezing, on Recurrent’s 2025 study of 30,000 cars, and up to 41% loss in AAA’s lab.

The defence is that pursuits are short, and it is mostly right. Geoffrey Alpert’s foundational research finds the typical pursuit runs under five minutes; Pennsylvania, one of the few places that publishes, logged 2,958 in 2023, nearly all short and local. England and Wales publish no national pursuit count at all — we know 18 people died in 17 pursuit-related incidents in 2024/25, but not the denominator. So a fleet is specified for a distribution: a five-minute town chase is nothing to a battery; the same car at 40% charge picking up a long motorway pursuit is another matter, and “the car had to pull out” is not a line any commander wants at an inquest.

Run it. The simulator uses the drag model above (it tracks the measured i4 M50 figures closely) and shows the same chase in your chosen EV and the diesel it would replace.

Interactive · the pursuit fuel test

What a chase leaves in the tank

Pick an electric car and a type of chase. You'll see the same pursuit run twice — in the EV, and in the diesel traffic car it would replace. Green means still fit for the shift; amber, finished but compromised; red, out of the fight.

1 · Electric car
2 · Type of chase
Battery
start

BMW 530d diesel
Diesel tank
start

Show the numbers
EVBMW 530d diesel
Distance covered
Energy / fuel used
Left at the end
Time to refill / recharge5 min at any forecourt
How this is modelled

Steady-state power is rolling resistance plus aerodynamic drag (P = (Crr·m·g + ½ρ·CdA·v²)·v), over a 90% drivetrain efficiency for the EVs, plus a constant 0.8 kW for the blue-light and comms fit. A pursuit is not steady-state, so each profile applies an intensity multiplier for the accelerate-brake cycle — 2.1× in town (net of regen), 1.5× on A-roads, 1.15× on the motorway where speed itself is the cost. Mass is kerb weight plus a double crew and a conversion allowance. A freezing day adds a 20% consumption penalty to the EVs only, matching Recurrent's 2025 winter study (78% range retention at 0°C). As a check: at a steady 90 and 120 km/h the model gives 157 and 206 Wh/km for the BMW i4 M50 against Bjørn Nyland's measured 155 and 217 — close, and kind to the EV. The diesel uses a fixed pursuit economy floor (13 mpg), because a hard-driven diesel's losses are the engine's, not the air's. The model carries no tyre scrub, no battery-heat derating and no low-charge power cut, so a real pursuit lands on the worse side of these figures, not the better.

Three things surface. The typical short chase barely dents a decent pack — the sceptics undersell that. A long motorway pursuit on a half-charge ends with the pursuing car as the constraint, and unlike the diesel it cannot splash-and-dash in five minutes — the enthusiasts undersell that. And the single biggest lever is the starting charge, which makes this a management question before an engineering one.

The battery does not fail the pursuit. The half-empty battery fails the pursuit — and half-empty is a management choice.

The armed response problem: Newton gets a vote

Pursuit is about energy; armed response is about mass, and you cannot charge your way out of mass. A UK armed response vehicle — for two decades a diesel BMW X5 — carries three firearms officers, carbines and sidearms, Tasers, enhanced armour, a ballistic shield, method-of-entry kit and the fixed conversion of gun safe, racking, comms and lighting. A 2024 Ergonomics review put specialist officers’ personal kit alone at up to 22 kg each; no force publishes the full fit weight, which is a freedom-of-information request waiting to be filed.

The payload arithmetic is brutal. The X5 offers about 730 kg; its nearest electric sibling, the BMW iX, about 540 kg — because the battery pack weighs roughly 700 kg, and every kilogram of it comes off payload before a door opens. Load both below.

Interactive · the payload test

Load an armed response car yourself

Tick the crew and kit onto the truck. Both cars carry the identical load — but each has its own legal weight limit, marked on the same scale. Watch the bar clear one line and cross the other.

Firearms officers
3
× 95 kg each, equipped
BMW X5 xDrive30dDiesel ARV — in service today
730 kg limit

BMW iX xDrive50Closest electric equivalent
540 kg limit

The tell from the 2021 British Mach-E conversion: the builders added a second 12-volt battery just for the police kit, so it would not eat the traction range. Engineers do not add mass to an EV for fun. And in 2026 no manufacturer sells an electric ARV — the NYPD’s 347 Mach-Es are patrol cars, not tactical trucks; the LAPD’s i3s were bought for non-pursuit duties and many sat idle. The biggest forces on earth are still waiting, which tells British buyers where the market actually is.

Diesel is not the safe option either — and charging is a management problem

A brief for the status quo would be wrong, because the diesel pursuit fleet just had its own crisis. In January 2020 PC Nick Dumphreys of Cumbria Police died when the N57 diesel engine of his BMW failed at speed on the M6 — a fault known since 2016, effectively confined to police duty cycles. Forces restricted the cars from pursuit; in January 2023 BMW ended specialist sales to UK police. The standard British traffic car and ARV platform came from a supplier that has walked away. “Proven” carries less than its advocates think.

Nor is the sceptic’s favourite anecdote what it seems. When Gloucestershire’s Police and Crime Commissioner said in 2022 that officers’ EVs “run out of puff” across a rural county, the detail underneath was that officers could not find working chargers mid-shift — infrastructure, not chemistry. That is the whole lesson for a buyer: the failure mode is charging, and charging is a procurement decision, not a property of the car. Depot rapid chargers, bought before the vehicles, sized to the shift pattern and sited behind the wire — because a marked car queuing at motorway services is a security problem as much as a delay. The public network has nearly doubled its rapid count in three years, to about 29,000, but at roughly 94% uptime it is not yet something a response fleet can depend on. A police car is not a taxi; “come back when the charger works” is not in the vocabulary.

Weigh both failure lists and the conclusion is simple: every powertrain is a risk portfolio, and a fleet strategy’s job is to say so out loud.

The options on the procurement desk

Four ways to spend the same money

The case: cheapest miles, best urban performance, and near-zero maintenance on a drivetrain with a fraction of the moving parts. For beat, neighbourhood and most response work the evidence above already backs it.

The catch: the tail — long pursuits, ARVs, rural 24/7 — is where it is weakest and where the inquests are. A hard all-electric date either accepts a capability gap or bets the technology closes on schedule, and the 8,000-charger bill lands first, the savings later.

Verdict: right destination, wrong single step. A force that flips its whole fleet on one date is specifying for the press release, not the shift pattern.

The case: plug-in hybrids stay legal to 2035 and solve both hard problems at once — electric drive for the urban 95%, a fuel tank for the tail. Germany’s autobahn-facing forces already run hybrid estates for motorway divisions whilst electrifying city patrol.

The catch: two drivetrains’ weight and maintenance, a small electric-only range, and a hybrid bought in 2029 is a 2042 disposal problem. And a hybrid that is never plugged in is just a heavy diesel.

Verdict: the defensible answer for pursuit-capable and ARV fleets this decade — if forces enforce the charging discipline that makes it worth the weight.

The case: hydrogen refuels in five minutes and carries no half-tonne pack; the Met has run Toyota Mirais since 2018 because a 24/7 fleet punishes charging downtime.

The catch: about 16 UK refuelling stations. A pursuit ending forty miles from one is a recovery-truck job, the cars and fuel are expensive, and national strategy has pivoted to heavy goods vehicles. It works only where the Met makes it work — a dense urban area with a station inside the patrol footprint.

Verdict: a niche a battery now fills more cheaply everywhere the stations do not reach.

The case: specify by role, not slogan. Electric for beat, urban and suburban response, and every static-heavy job. Hybrid for roads policing and ARVs, reviewed each cycle as packs improve. A few diesels where the risk assessment demands, with a published sunset. Chargers before cars, depot-side, sized to the shift — because the simulator shows the state of charge at deployment decides more than the badge on the bonnet.

The catch: it is unglamorous, headline-free, and it means admitting some police cars will burn diesel into the 2030s. It also asks 43 forces to give one national answer.

Verdict: this is where the evidence points. The fleets that get it right will electrify the 90% early and tell the truth about the 10%.

The Fremont call is told as a joke at the electric car’s expense. Heard again, it is just pursuit management: a professional reporting a constraint and handing off. Every police car ever built has had constraints — the diesels idling outside the station tonight have a fatal one on the record. The electric fleet’s are at least legible: a cube law, a payload budget, a state of charge. Those you can plan for, buy for and explain. The question on the procurement form is not whether an electric car can catch a criminal. Mostly, it can. It is whether the fleet is specified for the average day or the worst one — and whether someone has funded the chargers and levelled with the public. A police service, of all institutions, does not get to choose the average.


Sources and further reading

Interactive tools: both were built for this article. The pursuit simulator’s physics model and its assumptions are documented inside the tool itself; the ARV loadout figures are manufacturer payload specifications plus published equipment weights, with estimates flagged. If you have better numbers — particularly a real ARV fit weight — get in touch.

Share this article

Rate this article

technology fleet roads policing armed policing net zero data

Discussion questions

  1. 1.

    Should pursuit-capable and armed response vehicles be formally exempted from fleet electrification targets, or does an exemption become a loophole that slows the whole transition?

  2. 2.

    If your force had one capital budget line for either 40 response-car chargers or 8 hybrid pursuit cars, which buys more public safety?

  3. 3.

    The average blue-light run is minutes long, yet fleets are specified for the rare worst case. Where else in policing do we buy for the tail rather than the median — and should we?

Related reading